Search Keyword Within Blog

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

Nevermind: The Album that Musically Started the 90s


It was 1991 and the music scene consisted of 80s pop crossing over to the new decade with minimal competition. Artists like Michael Jackson, Paula Abdul, Janet Jackson, Guns n’ Roses, Bon Jovi, and others rocked the 80s and were prepared to run away with the 90s as well. Pop pretty much dominated all as r&b had not yet really caught on; rap had just got only their second #1 hit in the Billboard charts in history (Ice, Ice, Baby), and rock music really was reduced to the glam rock that the underground was growing tired of. There had not been a big new musical wave since Led Zeppelin and the Arena Rock scene back in the mid-late 70s. Music at the time was sugar-coated candy that’s enjoyable in small bursts until the next new pop song comes along. And then came Nevermind.

It has been 20 years since Nirvana’s legendary breakthrough album quietly popped into stores and jump-started a new wave of music, a new sound, and a new voice for a generation that had been shunned musically for quite some time. Under their worldwide smash “Smells Like Teen Spirit,” Nirvana’s Nevermind became arguably the first alternative rock album to fluctuate away from the college and underground crowd and seep into the entire musical mainstream. And Nirvana didn’t just become a huge popular band, but opened the door for dozens of other rock bands that had been under-the-radar in the 80s and also for up-and-coming bands within the same region.


R.E.M., Metallica, Pearl Jam, Alice in Chains, Soundgarden, Red Hot Chilli Peppers, Smashing Pumpkins, Stone Temple Pilots, Weezer, Bush, Radiohead, Oasis (whether you guys like it or not punks), and Blur (among many many others) rose in popularity at around the same time period as Nevermind’s Billboard and worldwide reign. One band is coincidence. Two bands, perhaps coincidence. More than a dozen? Beginning of a revolution. Beginning of something new. Nevermind started out small and by the end of 1992 was outselling Michael Jackson’s latest album by a longshot. Not only did this instant smash destroy the career of many pop and rock acts, it would sell over 30 million copies worldwide and remains one of the most influential and important albums in the last 30 years. This album set the benchmark for the sound of 90s rock—alternative or not. The 90s didn’t start in 1990, but in 1991 when Nirvana truly arrived.


So just what makes this album so special? What allowed it to hit such a nerve in the music industry? Well, we can start with what listeners had been dealing with for years. 80s glam rock consisted of your overblown, over-produced music that had lyrics abut rampaging around, having fun, messing around with the ladies, taking drugs, among other crazy things everyone did in the 80s. Surely some of it was great (Van Halen anyone?) but none of this music truly touches the soul, truly strikes emotional nerves. Glam rock is to rock fans what pop music is to the mainstream---good, but ultimately forgettable candy-coated minutes of amusement to the ears. 80s metal actually was happening as a way to combat this glam rock---Metallica, Anthrax, Slayer, Iron Maiden, and others were playing music as loud, fast, and ferocious as possible to appeal to those sick of the Van Halen-Poison-Bon Jovi sound.


Nevermind’s sound consisted of music that you swear was played in a garage with no production value whatsoever. Three people were in this band: a guitarist, a bassist, and a drummer; nothing more, nothing less. In an age when dozens of people worked on Michael Jackson’s music or when 5-6 people were involved in the same rock band, Nirvana’s simplified sound can be attributed to the fact that there was no rhythm guitar, no keyboard, no extra bassist, no extra drumming in the background, and very minimal cleansing of the guitars. That’s what grunge is, very distorted, very edgy, very raw rock music that is unpredictable, unfocused, unorganized, but just catchy enough to grab your attention and force you to adapt. They didn’t sound like a band set out to make ishloads of money, they sounded like a band that just loved to play. And they didn’t make music for the mainstream, the mainstream adapted to their music.


And they didn’t just play, they played from the heart. While they aren’t the first band to write all the lyrics with their hearts on the sleeves, they popularized the technique for a new generation. Glam rock avoided the emotions and tribulations of life; Nirvana hit it straight-on with full intentions. Vague and constantly-questionable lyrics plagued the entire album, as its mystique and vague aura of it all actually contributed to the unique sound that struck all the right nerves to a new generation of rock fans and wanna-be rock stars. Grunge isn’t ever limited to just one consistent sound either, Nevermind and the best grunge music out there (Pearl Jam’s Ten, Nirvana’s In Utero, Stone Temple Pilots’ Core) features a wide range of vocals, guitars, and moods.


Smells Like Teen Spirit is a 5-minute anti-everything medley that features a great guitar solo, a screaming finale, and a very catchy riff. Something in the Way is a purposely quiet tune that rarely ever increases in noise, as if they are performing this in a secluded, isolated part of town. Come as You Are is a guitar-heavy track that sounds like more bass than anything else, while incorporating a very slow pace and of course, vague lyrics. Drain You is a very dirty song in terms of production value, and for that it works well. In Bloom, arguably their best song in the album is an extremely ironic song about people singing along to songs despite not knowing what it means with an excellent guitar solo, a very catchy guitar/bass riff, and of course, a roller-coaster like transition between light and heavy sounds. And another one of my favorites, Lithium, is just a crazy sinister song with lyrics bouncing all over the place, a wide range of vocals and volumes, and all wrapped up with a great chorus.

The album has so many influential tracks, sounds, moments, and innovative techniques that to this very day we see bands constantly trying to hammer out the same type of sound produced in this made-for-$500,000 medley of Northwest rock. While most of its modern-day success can be attributed to the fact that Kurt Cobain became a martyr of the rock star life with his suicide, you can’t deny its power back when he was alive, Nirvana was alive and strong, and all these new bands were bursting with anticipation for a chance to shine. Massive musical revolutions like this one do not happen often (Beatlemania, Rise of British Metal in the 70s, Arena Rock /New Wave in the early 80s, The Backstreet Boys Pop Group Takeover of the late 90s, The Latin Revolution of 1999, the Flower Power Pop Scene of today) but it’s even rarer to see a whole portion of the population represent itself through the music of one band.

One can only imagine what would have happened if Kurt had stayed alive and been around for the continuing domination of alternative rock and the eventual rise of nu-metal. The question is would the music scene be totally different had Kurt Cobain not killed himself and brought down all these grunge bands with him? Would we have the music of today reigning supreme if Nirvana had still existed? Nirvana was a few steps away from becoming the next Beatles, whether you like it or not.

The Beatles, love them or hate them, definitely did not keep the same sound. They started out as a pop group and evolved into a psychedelic rock band in a mere couple of years. But as they evolved, their fans were intently following, eating up any music the Beatles were throwing at them. That band couldn't miss. Despite their eternal influence on an entire generation of people, the band barely lasted over half a decade before the unfortunate breakup. With In Utero, Nirvana’s third album, being (purposely) dramatically and extremely different from Nevermind, how much longer would Generation X follow this band? Its one of the great mysteries of music history, and all we can do is ponder because after Cobain pulled that trigger, escaping all the fame he didn’t want, Nevermind and its revolutionary tale of success came to an end.


But we are not here to be saddened by his death, we are here to preserve and continue his legacy by recognizing the greatest work from one of the best bands in recent decades. While they didn’t spend much time together in the music scene (and stopped performing way too soon), their few albums paved the way for an influx of music that would temporarily kill the pop scene, usher in a lot of wonderful music, and end the careers of many artists from the 80s, rendering them as afterthoughts. Nevermind is a masterful album that has honestly aged quite well. Its tunes are still catchy, its lyrics are still crazy and sometimes unstructured, and Kurt Cobain despite not being the best singer, or guitarist, or writer, dug deep into his soul and still managed to create beautiful music. Great music can come from anyone, and Nevermind was the defining example of this. They were three men in Seattle with an underground audience that worked together to make something that didn’t just hit, but struck pure gold. And started something new.





Happy 20th Anniversary, Nevermind.

And rest in peace, Kurt Cobain.

Monday, September 19, 2011

Drive: 0/10


A Multi-Layered Abuse to the Film Industry,
19 September 2011

So I walked out of the movie Drive. This is the first time I've ever done such a thing. I've seen a lot of bad movies in my day but there has never been one that infuriated me to a point in which I couldn't continue. And being a film lover, I sat down and analyzed just why exactly this movie ticked me off so much. What was it about this movie that drove me up the wall to a point in which I walked out before I even got to see the conclusion? It wasn't the acting. It wasn't the music. And it wasn't the lush cinematography. What irked me the most was that Drive was disguising itself as an indie flick when in actuality it wanted to become an action movie so badly.

And this strategy while an insult to the entire institution of filmmaking, worked. It got rave reviews at film festivals here and there and got nice reviews from critics, lavishing the acting, supposed tension, and cinematography. I watch this movie because of the rave reviews and literally saw the Transporter movie wrapped in an indie flavor, nothing more. The first half, where we supposedly see "character development," consists of characters engaging in extremely minimal small talk and the rest of the time just staring at each other. I am not kidding. After the tense opening which reveals our main character's secret job (which is familiar to the opening of Transporter), we get nothing for about 40 minutes. Except a lot of pointless scenes.

Drive is about a very good stuntman that doubles as a secret driver at night (Ryan Gosling) who silently falls for his new neighbor (Carey Mulligan) while at the same time gets mixed up in a mob scene (which loosely is a Transporter plot). The first half has all the development, only in the second half is when we see all the action and driving you've been observing in the previews. Based off a novel of the same name, the script must have been easy to write, because it barely has any dialogue while the story is pretty much a mashup of Tarantino-like violence with Transporter-like symptoms.

The movie is so inconsistent, and amongst the small pieces that don't fit together they are all sparkles of what we've seen before—and what we've seen before has all been superior. The supposed amazing chase sequences? Bourne and Ronin does them better----and to a similar budget extent, The Transporter. The supposed amazing violent tension? I can name dozens of movies that do it better. And the extreme violence that is inconsistent with the theme, tone, pace, and characterization of the first half of this slum? Of course, while it doesn't quite match the plot it's been perfected years upon years ago by Tarantino and even to an extent Robert Rodriguez.

But another big reason why I dislike this film so much is because with Drive, we've seen it all before, and yet the critics will not point this out—or choose to avoid it. We've seen these types of movies before (quiet men that has their actions do all the talking), we've seen this type of ultra-action before, and we've seen these stupid attempts at conflicting and blending genres far too many times in the indie and mainstream scene. Drive was originally billed as blockbuster during development so what do they do? Hide the fact that it's the clichéd low-caliber blockbuster that's trying so hard to be a European Tarantino hybrid. They trimmed the dialogue, screen time, and for the Cannes Film Festival nixed the action billing and called it an independent film. They literally were changing the packaging and tone of the movie based off of box office numbers. That's disgusting. They were trying to sway the critics by changing the entire genre.

Bottom Line: Drive, you are a pathetic, pointless, stupid, trite, slow, muggy, grudgy, tasteless, senseless, disposable, forgettable movie with abysmal pacing, abysmal writing, and no sense of direction whatsoever from the first second to the last second I watched before deciding to walk away. You don't know what movie you want to become, as you literally spit yourself through at least three different genres that actually repeal each other like a magnet. You barely clock in at 100 minutes, yet it felt like two hours the first half in. I will not blame the acting, for they had next to nothing to work with. I will not blame the cinematography, which wasn't bad either. I will blame the fact that your crew decided to pretend like your movie was artsy, underground, and indie, when in actuality your movie is this ultraviolent action movie that rears its ugly head long after the audience has fallen asleep through the numbing first half.

Your movie sucks.

Bad.

The Darko Treatment


I am going to coin a brand new phrase that I know will not catch on but darn it, I am going to use it for all my future sports articles. After seeing Cam Newton once again deliver a powerful performance (and against the Packers to boot) I am sure everyone in Denver is pondering what could have happened if they had given Tim Tebow the same type of love. Not saying Tebow can provide these types of numbers (although he is more than capable of doing so), but what I am saying is that with time and care, he could have developed into a nice quarterback going into his second year. Instead, we have the hapless Broncos barely etch out a win over the Bengals (at home) while observe the most dangerous 0-2 team in the NFL, the Carolina Panthers, stand tall and mighty behind their brand new quarterback.

It’s a darn shame the Panthers don’t play the Broncos this season, which would have made for potentially excellent football. So while Kyle Orton continues his subpar-below .500 performance, New-in-Town has already thrown for over 800 yards in just a couple of games. Remember, the Panthers have been 2-16 in their last 18 regular season games yet they carry more momentum than the Broncos. But alas, Tebow is third-string. As long as he is in Denver, he might never have a chance to succeed. And that my friends, is the Darko Treatment.


The Darko Treatment is what happens when a young player with plenty of talent that succeeded in many levels during the college/minor league days isn’t given a chance when entering the big leagues for one reason or another. The Darko Treatment is when potentially great careers are tarnished, damaged, ruined because they didn’t get the proper help, care, and devotion once they hit professional ball. In all honesty, the best way to ensure that you unpolished talent shines like a nice diamond in the future is with time-----playing time. My new coined phrase is named after the very sad career of Darko Milicic.

Darko was selected 2nd in the NBA Draft by the Detroit Pistons way back in 2003. Larry Brown had no plans to ever using him, as they already had a powerful lineup that took them to an NBA Title and constant rushes to the Eastern Conference Finals. The man was used only when the Pistons were winning by a couple touchdowns late in the game. He was averaging barely a half-dozen minutes per game. And this didn’t happen one season, it actually happened for three seasons in a row until the Orlando Magic finally got him. By that time, instead of becoming a star player or a well-developed sidekick, he was a benchman that was bouncing around from team to team. Last I checked he was playing for the Timberwolves.


Let’s compare him now to the #1 draft pick of that same season: LeBron James. While I hate the man now, back in his first year he practically was given an immeasurable amount of care, time, and devotion to make sure he truly developed into a star. He worked closely with Mike Brown, the underrated coach at the time for the Cleveland Cavaliers. LeBron James was fresh out of high school, but had a thirst for basketball and a great amount of talent. He was a post-up game and attitude check away from being the next Kobe Bryant. Eventually, the Cavs would become a powerhouse franchise, constantly entering the playoffs and at one point had back-to-back 60-win seasons. Did they have a good team? No, what they did have was fully-developed talent (that didn’t even go to college) and a good coach backing him up. One can only wonder what would have happened if Larry Brown, another well-known defensive specialist, had worked with Darko’s potential. He was a 7-foot center that can shoot, move the ball, and defend. What more do you want?


Tebow and Darko aren’t the only examples of the Darko Treatment: J.J. Reddick is an outstanding example of this--and one that personally affects me being a Magic fan. He is a Duke legend, one that has broken nearly every scoring record for his school, and yet here he is still on the bench when for three years he was promised a starting role in the Magic rotation. He is hands-down one of the most popular players for the Magic, and this is despite not actually being a starter. Unlike some of the bums that give minimal effort towards anything in that lineup, J.J. gives his all continuously. He will never fully blossom because he spent so many years under the cellar. Stan Van Gundy has been a great coach for a mediocre team in the past years, but has dropped the ball with this man.


And let's compare this to a baseball team that has purposely has avoided the likes of the Darko Treatment in recent years, leading to surprising successful runs year after year after year. The Tampa Bay Rays actually throw their new talent in the thick of pennant races, start them off in very tough situations. David Price, Jeremy Hellickson, Desmond Jennings, and now Matt Moore are just prime examples of players that started out playing in the middle of a heated race with the Yankees and Red Sox. While some critics will say that this is no way to start off young talent, Joe Maddon and co. do this because it displays their trust in these upstart rookies. This type of trust ensures that these players are more than just pawns in an eternal chess match against the rivals--they are part of the future of the organization. And now, with one of the youngest (and cheapest) squads in the majors, the Rays are still in the Wild Card race against the heavy-hitters Boston Red Sox and California Angels.


So back to Tim Tebow, this man needs his chance to play. You can’t squander his youth years otherwise he can’t mature and develop when he becomes a full-time pro, if that ever actually happens. How does a man with two national championships under his belt (and in the inane SEC conference) still get lack of respect from the other Broncos peers? Kyle Orton is a miserable 12-18 with the Denver Broncos. What does it take for Tebow to head out there? A 0-16 season? The Broncos are ruining a great talent, and you all know that’s one of my pet peeves---wasted talent. That’s what LeBron is, but for very different reasons.

Broncos, you have wonderful talent on the bench. The SEC, despite being evil in every single way possible, can craft good wholesome quarterbacks. The Panthers saw this in Newton and used him as first-string immediately. And while the Panthers are 0-2, their confidence level is as high as it has been in years. They see a future. With the Broncos, they don’t see any future, just a muddled present.


Broncos, please stop the Darko Treatment; you are killing a career slowly but surely.